RESULTS FOR DAY | |
---|---|
Contracts: | 6 |
Net $P/L: | -466 |
Wins: | 1 |
Losses: | 5 |
Win%: | 17 |
Avg$Win: | 9 |
Avg$Loss: | -95 |
21 hours ago
A daily chronicle of results of one retail futures trader trading my own accounts. I define myself as a day trader and generally swing for at least a few points most of the time. But I do make the occasional scalp for ticks too.
RESULTS FOR DAY | |
---|---|
Contracts: | 6 |
Net $P/L: | -466 |
Wins: | 1 |
Losses: | 5 |
Win%: | 17 |
Avg$Win: | 9 |
Avg$Loss: | -95 |
"I'll have to look at filtering signals a bit on days like today as I was not trading the longer term trend."
ReplyDeleteThe trend was clearly up on 3-min, 5-min, etc. I watch ES traders on StockTwits, and noticed a lot of them were taking counter-trend trades from 895 area all the way up to 908, and most of them were exiting on losses. On a big momentum up move like today, I've found it's best to try to enter in direction of trend or just stay out.
Direction aside; your Avg Win vs. Avg Loss is problematic, IMHO.
The strange thing about trend day is it always looks like it is going to be the top/bottom but then it just keeps going and going. By the end of day you wonder why you miss such an obvious signal, price stays on one side of a MA all day long.
ReplyDeleteE-Mini, the 1 win was just a scratch for a tick so you can't conclude much from avg.win, avg.loss today. I actually was up 2 pts. (going for more) on that one and set stop to breakeven and got stopped of course. Just wasn't my day!
ReplyDeleteMBA, when calculating Avg Win/Avg Loss, I don't count the break-even/scratch trades.
ReplyDeleteBut if you just plot the Avg Win vs Avg Loss from the day you started this blog, the trend is apparent; most of the times the avg loss is greater than the avg win. That means your method needs to hit a 80+% win rate (on some days 90+ %) just to break-even, which is unrealistic and unsustainable IMHO.
Just some advice looking in from the outside. Best of luck!